A current clearance is one of the most valuable things you leave the service with, and one of the most commonly mishandled on a resume. What it is worth, how to say it, and what not to say.
Home › Security Clearance
Not because the clearance itself makes you better at the job. Because sponsoring one costs a contractor a great deal of money and takes many months, during which the seat sits empty and the contract still has to be delivered.
A candidate who already holds one can start now. That is the entire value, and it is why cleared roles frequently pay more than the same role without the requirement.
Two things decide how much that is worth to you: the level, and whether it is current. A lapsed clearance is worth considerably less than an active one, though far more than none at all, because reinstating is much faster and cheaper than starting from nothing.
The lowest level. Least common in job postings, and on its own it opens fewer doors than people expect. Still worth listing — it means you have been through an investigation and been found suitable, which is not nothing.
By far the most widely requested. Held by an enormous number of service members, which is exactly why it is worth listing: a great many defense and government contracting roles require it, and holding one puts you in a much smaller pool than the general market.
Typically reinvestigated periodically. If you are unsure whether yours is still current, it is worth finding out before you write it down.
A materially more expensive investigation, which is what makes holders valuable. Fewer roles require it, but those that do have a much smaller candidate pool and the pay tends to reflect that.
Sensitive Compartmented Information access on top of Top Secret, sometimes with a polygraph. This is the most valuable combination in the market. The candidate pool is small, the sponsorship cost is very high, and intelligence and cyber contractors compete hard for people who already hold it.
If you hold this, say so on your profile. It is the single line most likely to get you contacted.
Say the level. Do not say the contents. The level and its status are routinely listed and recruiters filter on them. What you had access to, which programs, which units, where and when — none of that helps you get hired, and it is of interest to people who are not recruiters.
Held TS/SCI clearance with CI polygraph while assigned to [unit] supporting [program] in [location] from 2019–2023.
Security clearance
Clearance: Active TS/SCI with CI polygraph
Clearance: Secret (active, last investigation 2023)
Clearance: Top Secret (inactive, eligible for reinstatement)
The first version tells a story nobody needs and names things that should not be on a public document. The second is what a recruiter searches for and can act on. Put it near the top, in its own line, not buried in a paragraph.
Put it in the headline if you hold Top Secret or above. That is the line that appears in search results, and cleared recruiters search on exactly those words.
Transitioning Veteran | Cleared Professional | Open to Work
Intelligence Analyst | All-Source & Threat Assessment | Active TS/SCI
"Cleared Professional" is not a thing anyone searches for. "TS/SCI" is.
Answer the question that was asked and stop. The useful answers are short.
"What level do you hold?" — Name it, say whether it is active, say roughly when it was last investigated.
"When does it expire?" — Clearances do not expire on a date the way a passport does; they lapse when you leave a position requiring access, and they stay reinstatable for a period after that. If you are within that window, say so plainly.
"What did you work on?" — This is the one to handle carefully, and the good answer is easy: describe the function, not the content. "I did all-source analysis supporting operational planning" is fine. Specific programs, targets, capabilities and locations are not, and a professional interviewer will respect the line. Anyone who pushes past it has told you something about them.
A clearance is tied to a position that requires access, not to you personally. When you leave, it becomes inactive — but for a period afterwards it can typically be reinstated far faster and more cheaply than a new investigation, which is precisely why employers still want you.
Two practical things. Know your dates — the level, the type of investigation and roughly when it was last done, before you start interviewing. And keep your affairs in order; the things that most commonly cause problems at reinvestigation are financial rather than dramatic.
Rules and timelines in this area are set by policy and do change. Confirm your own position with your security manager before you separate, or with the facility security officer at a prospective employer — they deal with this daily and will usually tell you straight.
Defense contracting is the obvious one, but it is not the largest share of the opportunity.
Federal announcements state their clearance requirement openly, which makes them a useful way to see what cleared work is being advertised right now — search federal openings mentioning clearance, or the ones on veteran hiring authorities.
Leaving it off. The most common and the most expensive. People assume it is obvious from their background. It is not, and recruiters filter on the word.
Overstating it. Never describe a lapsed clearance as active, and never round Secret up. It is checked, it is checked early, and being caught ends the process immediately.
Being vague. "Security clearance" without a level is nearly useless in a search and reads as hedging.
Saying too much. Programs, units, locations, capabilities. It does not help you get hired and it is the part of your profile that interests the wrong audience.
Assuming it is your whole pitch. The clearance gets you found. What you can actually do gets you hired, and a profile that leads with the clearance and says little else tends to attract volume rather than quality.
Put it where it will be seen: the LinkedIn Profile Builder puts your clearance into the headline it generates, and the Resume Builder puts it near the top where a recruiter looks first.
Then federal announcements, which state the requirement on every posting, and the job board.